Frequently Answered Questions
Q: What is it about the statement 'God is Love' do you consider wrong?
Q: Is it possible for government spending to actually stifle an economy?
Q: David, who do you profess to be?
Q: What is the greatest obstacle the individual must overcome?
Q: What is a 'New World Order'?
Q: Where do women fit into the story of Revelation?
Q: Where does terrorism fit into Revelation?
Q: What do you believe is the water of life?
Q: What do you believe is the fruit of the tree of life?
Q: David, it has been reported that you are known to go ballistic when someone tries to proselytize the biblical saying "God is Love". Why is that?
A: Hey folks, it might just be a matter of terms with you, but to me it is serious ! God is the totality of what is. God is life and death. He is growth, and decay. He is creation and destruction. God is the law-period! He does not figure into the realm of emotions.
The lord's name is love. Love can be brought to realization by man, so that God might see himself. This premise does not make God love, because man is in the equation, and man is not inherently perfect-for he is emotional.
Logic would dictate that saying 'God is Love' assumes also that 'God is hate' I do not believe that, for man is the only creature I know of-that hates! For me, God is the totality of what is. This force called love is a personal possession and experience. Do not bastardize your life, your personality, the unique trinity that you may be-with something called brotherly love.
I am sure that the lord I know is more than a little bit psychotic. That is what is fun about her; but, the lord, my God? I don't think so.
Someone who tries to sell to me the idea that God is love usually wants my spiritual energies i.e. my love. Seldom can you serve two masters, and man, there are a lot of would be masters out there
Witchcraft i.e. brotherly love, is a trap not readily severed. It breaks my heart when some well meaning fool says: 'Don't you believe the Bible is the word of God?' Well, I believe that God is in there somewhere, but not everywhere.
Q: Much of the consternation about the end of Ages-revolves around a prophecy concerning a One World Government, or rather, a New World Order.
A: It would probably be stupidity to allow the autocrats that much power. The fact that there are different governments & differing value systems, both moral and monetary, is what keeps the whole thing working. This is especially true in the monetary world where there is no real basis for value, except what another monetary system will bear in trading with another.
There is however, another phenomenon occurring which cannot be stopped, and which I think it behooves humanity to engineer in a moral and productive manner.
This is sometimes referred to as The New World Order
It starts with immigration, which proceeds to criminal records. Then you have terrorist threats & atomic energy checks, which becomes the motivation for a worldwide identity data base. This becomes big brother, a big brother able to know when you defecate, a big brother who in the end does nothing but control and oppress.
For pity sake-These things are the prophesied behaviors ascribed to the beast from the abyss. Make it count for something! The autocrats, and even some very reasonable folks are going to force you to give up the freedom to be invisible. Get something in return for your cooperation by exercising a little self-determination!
Just as I am sure that there will one day be a sales tax on all financial transactions, including investments, borrowings, tax payments, government expenditures, non-profits and gifts , I am positive that there will one day be checks on procreation. Make it a condition for receiving equitable entitlements.
I am also positive that there will one day be a worldwide security net, as well as food allowances for everyone, regardless of need. The whole thing simply won't work unless the rules apply to everyone. To qualify for this security, it will be imperative to accept and demand, limits on procreation, and growth of all kinds.
Q: Terrorism, What a Subject!
A: People who are afraid make others afraid. People who are paranoid make other folks paranoid. Like the cop on the beat looking for trouble, too often this just results in the enforcer making trouble to justify their own existence.
Events like 911 are a cry for help I do not understand why the issues never get addressed. Reactions always seem to be focused on an eye for an eye; 911 itself was an answer to prayers for United States officials, especially the military, and I personally find it hard to accept solutions of force. People, you walked right into it. Homeland security was the goal, invasion of your privacy was the goal, and this has nothing to do with terrorists.
The issues never change. It is never about the occupation, it is always about being told what to do by the occupier. Should Israel tend to their moral obligation concerning property rights, economic freedoms with the Palestinians, and enabling fair representation for these folks, there would not be a problem with this bunch of stiff-necked fools. Take your cue from Ireland; when the oppression stopped and the economy improved, the strife ceased!
Terrorism exists because over-population has made people unbalanced, and afraid. Terrorism is natures way of seeing balance restored. Mankind has gotten too good at defeating disease, etc.. Terrorism exists because there are oppressors. Terrorism exists because small minded bureaucrats like to enforce a so-called rule of law. Great minds believe only in the rule of justice.
Q: David, Who are You?
A: I am who I am. I could play a lot of parts. So could You!
I like to say that I am the original red man. My grandmother used to say that I was the first son of the church in Laodicea, by the last son of the church in Philadelphia. Personally, I identify with the being described at Revelation 10,2.
"And he had in his hand a little book open; and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot upon the earth
There is some justification for this, as I was marked at birth on my right foot, and right hand with phalange webbing, like an aquatic mammal .
Q: Taxation, good or evil?
A: Taxation is ontological, that is to say-it is just the way things are done. Governments arose out of a need for common protection. They persisted when money became part of the equation, and in a democratic society it is imperative that checks are in place to stifle the innate greed for power by bureaucrats.
The integrity of money should be the only reason they continue.
Unfortunately, modern economists have concluded that governments can be a very useful means to either stifle, or expand financial markets.
In socialist feudal times, the king minted money, then his tax collectors went out and took it back, so that it could be re-spent.
This oversimplification is still the way of the world, except that now there is no real standard of value in money. The bond, credit, and foreign exchange markets have become the place where value standards are set.
So, a communistic feudal economy is defined as an economy where the government drives all spending i.e. when their budget is equivalent to 50% of their country's national product. This sort of society is lazy, unimaginative and repressive, has no room for capitalism, and will stagnate and die. Worse still, the central bank of such an economy is unable to manage the money supply.
The point I am attempting to make here is that most folks see the GNP figures in the wrong light. It is common practice for governments to say they comprise only a small percentage of the GNP. They forget to say that there are budget items ascribed to states, counties, and cities. They want you to believe that they are only responsible for a small part of the economy. In reality governments are comprised of federals, states, counties, cities, and whatever else the maggots come up with. In order to comment on the GNP I need you to understand it as I do. Let's say the king spends $33.333. Now the tax collector goes out, and collects $33.333, from those folks who got hold of the initial expenditure of $33.333. Hopefully, this money traded hands a few times making the economy even larger through capitalism. When you add up these three items, the king, the tax collector, and the taxpayer, you now have the GNP of $100, or rather 100% Bear in mind that I am describing a managed economy, a feudal economy; a socialist, if not a communistic one.
Even so, most people are subconsciously persuaded that the government comprises only a fraction of the total. In actuality they comprise almost all of it. They would have you believe that government comprises 33.3%, and capitalism comprises 66.7% The real way of looking at these figures follow thus: Government receipts and borrowings-33.3% Government expenditures-33.3% Taxpayer capitalistic ventures-33.3%. Because I started with the king being responsible for driving the entire economy, it is not possible for that figure to be higher than 33.3% without unrealistic manipulations of reality I hope the reader notes the trend in the graph below The average taxpayer will say-so what is a 4.53% deficit? Again I say, you see it with rose-colored glasses. It is $4.53 of the $33.33 which is allotted to you in this life. The percentage of what is yours is quite high! $4.55 of the allotted $33.33 is 13.65%.
| GNP year | The King (33.333) | Tax Collector (33.333) | Tax payer (33.333) | Capitalism |
| 2000 | $32.87 | $32.87 | $34.26 (0.93) | +2.79% |
| 2001 | $32.80 | $32.80 | $34.40 (1.07) | +3.21% |
| 2002 | $33.97 (0.64) | $33.97 (0.64) | $32.06 (-1.27) | -3.80% |
| 2003 | $34.96 (1.63) | $34.96 (1.63) | $30.08 (-3.26) | -9.78% |
| 2004 | $35.24 (1.91) | $35.24 (1.91) | $29.52 (-3.81) | -11.43% |
| 2005 | $35.43 (2.10) | $35.43 (2.10) | $29.14 (-4.19) | -12.57% |
| 2006 | $35.61 (2.28) | $35.61 (2.28) | $28.78 (-4.55) | -13.65% |
Governments and their taxation is bad when it becomes progressive, and pervasive. Too often, the easy way is taken by borrowing money for shortfalls, or wish lists that simply cannot be readily paid for. More often than not, it is for wages not earned or deserved by this public sector, and so-called cost of living increases fall in this category The justification is usually that we are a wealthy people with resources that we can mortgage. Each year the various government entities comprise a larger percentage of your total economy, and each year individual efforts comprise less. Each year there is less wiggle room, less savings, fewer discretionary decisions, and less freedom. The markets will see to it. In actuality there has been a negative rate of savings and capital accumulation in the years noted, and these numbers too are part of the GNP report.
For further discussion, you will need to see my book. Suffice it to say that a free economy exists when this taxpayer figure is 33.33% or more. Anything less, and you have a managed society, a socialist society, until at 0% you will have a communist society. We all know the fate of the communist structure.
The first thing that happens in the communistic structure is that hope dies, and with it inspiration. How can one fight something they cannot get their hands on? In other words, the United States is becoming a communist society, and the only way to make up that negative 4.55% is through inflation, massive borrowings of funny money, and the consequent devaluation of your money and it's purchasing power. Your children will still be saddled with the debt; I believe revelation calls that a double edged sword. How you doing America? Some day I hope it dawns on folks what the management style of a republican really is!
There is no godly reason that a nation which prides itself on capitalism should play things so close to the edge. Years ago we were rescued from a global recession by something called 'New Deal Economics' The recent economic stimulus package is taken from that page in history, and I submit that it will not work. It will make things worse for the simple reason that the system is already expanded to its' limits.. It is time to restore your national integrity America, and I suggest a taxpayer revolt before it comes to revolution and meltdown.
On June 8, 2008 David writes: Next April I will post the figures for 2007 when they are officially released. The 2007 fiscal year ends Sept 30, 2008. In closing I would remind the public that governmental budgets are derived from the GNP of the previous year. 2006 Budget year: {1/1/2006-12/31/2006 for 2007 fiscal year: 10/1/2007-9/30/2008} Don't let the maggots convince you otherwise. They are the ones who set up the rules. Make them live by them!
Q: What are the greatest impediments to peace and freedom
A: Autocracy & Bigotry-Remember that your rights and responsibilities are also your neighbors rights and responsibilities
Egotism-Remember that the sins of the fathers are visited upon the children. Going through first death can be very, very tough on your opinions about yourselves.
Population Growth-You need to perfect what you have before you can grow. People, breeding like rabbits is antisocial! You must beat this one, or God and nature will forever visit strife upon you.
The most difficult challenge in the years to come will be trying to decide the difference between good, and evil. Both forces work through the same vehicle nowadays, and that is why it behooves an individual to discover their own integrity. Revelation warns of this problem in chapter sixteen.
Q: David, is the Water of Life a secret?
A: No, read chapter 22 in Revelation, and should God want you to know, it will be very, very obvious. I have mentioned it several places in these pages, and you are welcome to review my references here, and here.
The water of life is the preferred way to go through first death. It can be necessary, enlightening, even productive. It can also be unduly hazardous to your mental health. It is my firm conviction that it is your urine. It is also my firm conviction that there is more to the story, which will be revealed in my book.
The Angel then showed me the river of life-giving water, clear as crystal, which issued from the throne of God and of the Lamb and flowed down the middle of the streets. On either side of the river grew the trees of life which produce fruit twelve times a year, once each month; their leaves serve as medicine for the nations.
Q: David, is the fruit of the tree of life a secret?
A: No, read chapter 22 in Revelation, line two, and should God want you to know, the instructions will be very, very obvious. I have mentioned it several places in these pages, and you are welcome to review my references here, and here.
The tree of life is critical for going through first resurrection. It is my firm conviction that it is your "essence" i.e. your semen. It is a never-ending process, and I have more to reveal in my forthcoming book.
Q: David, Revelation appears to have been written for men. Where do women enter the picture?
A: I honestly do not know, as I am not a woman. Women are defined in the chapter as Babylon, or as the lord, manifesting love. They are a vessel for men. I do not think the water of life, or partaking of the fruit of the tree applies to them directly. I do think it behooves them to learn the mathematical formula for 666 so that they take mates for love, rather than security and prestige. There really does exist a war of the sexes, and I believe that women have more emotional, animal instincts than men do, and need to be stifled occasionally, and I truly believe that men can not remember they are mortal beings unless they are exposed to women.
It is imperative for me to conjecture that a pregnant woman has much to offer a man's spirituality and authority. I believe that a woman's water has much to offer. In this area I must admit that the antichrist has stifled me.